You’re not allowed to do that. So, many, many years later they found a way to retcon it, as they say, but it was just… It’s interesting. The audience is in control of what sticks. James Bond’s scar? Nope. Doctor Who’s real name? No. Sherlock Holmes would never wear a deerstalker in the middle of town — yes, he would. Because we like him in that.
Q&A with Steven Moffat | Oxford Union (2021)
Hey! Just in case anybody thinks this is true (or is confused, like I’ve seen some people in the comments), it’s not. I know, it’s easy to believe something is true when the longest running showrunner of the new series says it this confidently, but it’s not.
Here’s the line to which I’m assuming he’s referring, from the Happiness Patrol (season 25 ep 2):
I don’t know about you, but my real name isn’t something that I mention as an aside while specifying it was my old school nickname. Lots of people consider a specific nickname to be their real name, but I think the context here is sufficient to assume that it’s not the case for the doctor.
So, I’m not sure why Moffat felt the need to emphasize (three times!) that this was the doctor’s “real name” but it’s not. Yes, this was their nickname at (presumably) the academy, no it is not a name they currently use, have used for any significant length of time, or consider their name.
Hope this clears things up!
(also i added alt text but I’ll put an id under the cut in case it doesn’t work)
Oh, no, it is true. Because that’s not the line
he’s referring to. That’s the retcon.
Happiness Patrol aired
1988:
25 years after the showed started, made by a large number of people who’d grown up watching the show and had opinions on things like “we shouldn’t know his name”.
But “Theta Sigma” is first in Armagggedon Factor: 1979.
A decade earlier, a completely different production team.
And in that episode, it’s—
DRAX: It is Theet, innit? Theta Sigma? Yeah, ‘course it is. Remember me, ay?
The nickname in that episode is “Thete” – there’s no suggestion that Theta Sigma
is anything but the Doctor’s actual standard full name, as attested by a guy who was in the same class as him 450 years ago. (And got stuck in Brixton for a while, hence the speech patterns.)
And the audience, including the people who’d work on the Cartmel era show nine years later, went “No.”
My whole life I’ve known that you must leave at least one mistake in your knitting or crochet or tapestry, because spirits/demons can get lost in the perfection of the stitches and be unable to find their way out.
If you don’t want a haunted scarf, you have to leave a mistake as an exit point.
This is beautiful but I can’t help but think that at least one of these originated with like, someone who fucked up their knitting and managed to convince everyone else it was intentional.
I’m almost certain this is what happened. Because whenever I am close to finishing a crochet project, especially something in the round where each row is more work than the last, and I find a mistake in the last row as I’m stitching into it
The closer I am to finishing and not wanting to undo 2h worth of work to change that one single into a double, the more likely I am to go “well. That’s the demons stitch then isn’t it”, and leave it be.
The demon stitch absolutely gives my ocd toxic perfectionism a loophole to allow something to remain a mistake, which is why I choose to believe in it.
